Tuis » Investigations, Legal, Politics

Traffic laws don’t apply to us. So say four Gauteng MECs

Submitted by on June 1, 2012 – 3:01 pmOne Comment
COMMENT:
By ATHANDIWE SABA and ANDREW TRENCH

SOME Gauteng MECs claim that they are exempt from speeding laws – because they are like firemen and ambulance drivers.
That’s the bizarre response M24i has received from four Gauteng’s MECs in response to our access to information request asking for records relating to speeding fines and accidents involving their official vehicles.
Our experience in getting these documents is worth sharing as it provides a taste of what an ordinary citizen can expect in trying to use the Promotion of Access to Information Act to get official records.
It has been an exercise in contradiction, frustration – and some eyebrow-raising claims.
At the beginning of this year we filed access to information applications with all Gauteng MECs after the horrendous accident involving the vehicle being used to ferry Local Government and Housing MEC Humphrey Mmemezi, that left West Rand teenager Thomas Ferreira in a coma.
The accident fuelled a major public debate about the conduct of the drivers of cars used for political VIPs – the “blue-light brigade” as they were dubbed.
M24i filed access to information requests asking for all records of all speeding fines and traffic offences the official vehicles of these MECs had attracted.
Out of the 10 departments in Gauteng only five presented the records which were requested on 27 February this year.
The Promotion of Access to Information Act gives entities receiving an application 30 days to respond to the request but none of the departments responded on time.
They are also entitled to request an extension of a further 30 days if required, but this extension is not automatic.
The PAIA act requires a designated “information officer” or “deputy information officer” to deal with requests made in terms of the law. The information officer is normally the accounting officer of a state entity.
These requests are not media inquiries. Any citizen is allowed to file them and they need to be dealt with in terms of the legislated procedures.
The range of contradictory responses illustrates how far we are from a culture of openness – and of commitment to access to information – in public bodies in South Africa.
Five departments gave us records. They were Roads and Public Transport (which produced this story),
Sports Arts Culture and Recreation (no fines or offences), Agriculture and Rural Development (minor incident), Health and Social Development (disclosed a hitherto unknown accident), Infrastructure Development which produced this story.
But four departments cited Section 60 of the National Road Traffic Act (see image and letter from the Finance Department) and claimed the same exemptions as those afforded to emergency workers.
Those that turned to this law were Education, Community Safety, Local Government and Housing and Finance.
The Premier’s Office claimed they would provide the records but we are still waiting.
The responses from the departments who turned to the National Road Traffic Act came after they had simply ignored our initial PAIA applications – and only after we filed internal appeals.
We are now turning to the courts to get access to the records we believe we are entitled to view.

One Comment »

  • “Four departments cited Section 60 of the National Road Traffic Act and claimed the same exemptions as those afforded to emergency workers.”
    “Those that turned to this law were:-
    Education, Community Safety, Local Government and Housing and Finance.”
    I beg to differ…
    Section 60 of the National Road Traffic Act No. 93 OF 1996 says:-
    “The driver of a fire-fighting vehicle, a rescue vehicle or an ambulance who drive such vehicle in the performance of his or her duties, a traffic officer who drives a vehicle in the carrying out of his or her duties or any person driving a vehicle while engaged in civil protection as contemplated in any ordinance made in terms of section 3 of the Civil Protection Act, 1977 (Act No. 67 of 1977), may disregard the directions of a road traffic sign which is displayed in the prescribed manner:

    Provided that-
    (a) he or she shall drive the vehicle concerned with due regard to the safety of other traffic; and
    (b) in the case of any such fire-fighting vehicle, rescue vehicle, ambulance or vehicle driven by a person while he or she is so engaged in civil protection, such vehicle shall be fitted with a device capable of emitting a prescribed sound and with an identification lamp, as prescribed, and such device shall be so sounded and such lamp shall be in operation while the vehicle is driven in disregard of the road traffic sign.”

    NOWHERE does it make mention OR exemption for anyone else, JZ, a Minister, an MEC, or any other driver thereof, or chauffeur of the above, has any right to use a blue light and siren, or to break any speed limit, disregard any road sign, or robot, traffic signal or other, EXCEPT if directed to do so by an authorised police or traffic officer, to avoid any hazard or obstruction, thereafter to fully comply with the road rules and signs. This applies to all motorists irrespective!
    Blue light bullies are illegal! – Period!

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar blog.


× 6 = twelve